110 Ohio App. 3d 566 - State v. Mootispaw’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 121 Ohio App. 3d 451 - State v. Nievas (1997), Brown v. Konteh (2009)
2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Jenks · State v. Hankerson · State v. Wolery · 28 Ohio App. 2d 29 - State v. Pruett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“abet” means to incite or to encourage. State v. Mootispaw (1996), 110 Ohio App.3d 566 , 674 N.E.2d 1222 . A person’s mere association with the principal offender is not enough. However, the state may demonstrate a person’s aiding and abetting of another in the commission of a crime through both direct and circumstantial evidence and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(A) No person, with purpose to deprive the owner of property or services, shall knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services in any of the following ways: {¶ 19} "(1) Without the consent of the owner or person authorized to give consent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(A) No person, with purpose to deprive the owner of property or services, shall knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services in any of the following ways: {¶ 19}”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.