Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Ohio App. 3d 583 - Binger v. Whirlpool Corp.

110 Ohio App. 3d 583 - Binger v. Whirlpool Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Irvine v. State · Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. Administrator · 11 Ohio App. 3d 159 - Angelkovski v. Buckeye Potato Chips Co. · Simon v. Lake Geauga Printing Co. · 21 Ohio App. 3d 168 - Kiikka v. Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well established that `fault is essential to the unique chemistry of a just cause termination.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “lawful so long as such evidence is given its proper weight”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.