110 Ohio App. 3d 649 - State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably 151 Ohio App. 3d 160 - State v. Gonzales (2002), 889 F. Supp. 2d 1014 - Render v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (2012)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Dixon · Grady v. Corbin · State v. Logan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) Where the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or more allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be convicted of only one.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The Ohio Supreme Court has traditionally applied federal law in the double jeopardy context.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Ohio's allied offenses statute, R.C. 2941.25 , protects against multiple punishments for the same criminal conduct in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the United States and Ohio Constitutions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.