State v. Buehner’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
80 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably State v. Colon (2008), State v. Horner (2010)
80 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hamling v. United States · State v. Sellards · State v. Skatzes · State v. Murphy · State v. Childs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n indictment that tracks the language of the charged offense and identifies a predicate offense by reference to the statute number need not also include each element of the predicate offense in the indictment.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he purposes of an indictment are to give an accused adequate notice of the charge, and enable an accused to protect himself or herself from any future prosecutions for the same incident.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“it is the predicate offense itself and not the elements of the predicate offense that is an essential element of the charged offense.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.