110 Or. App. 567 - State v. Willhite’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1993
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““What [this reasoning] fails to recognize is that the ‘general nature’ of the procedure is precisely what makes it defective. To approve a policy because it is so general that an officer must look everywhere he can think of flies in the face of the requirement that the inventory be ‘conducted according to standardized criteria,’ [citation], or ‘established routine.’ ” (State v. Willhite (1992), 110 Or. App. 567, 574 , 824 P.2d 419, 422 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.