Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 P.3d 840 - Do v. Farmer

Do v. Farmer’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mahler v. Szucs · 119 Wash. 2d 210 - Bryant v. Joseph Tree, Inc. · Spokane Co. v. State Ex Rel. Co. Comrs. · Mahler v. Szucs · 54 Wash. App. 841 - In the Matter of Guardianship of Lasky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the rule threatens mandatory attorney fees for any party who requests a trial de novo but does not improve its position. Next, it offers the party an incentive to withdraw its request, with the possibility of avoiding attorney fees at the discretion of the [trial] court. Both the stick and the carrot are directed at the party requesting the trial de novo, attempting to influence its choices in the hope of reducing court congestion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The court shall assess costs and reasonable attorney fees against a party who appeals the award and fails to improve the party’s position on the trial de novo. The court may assess costs and reasonable attorney fees against a party who voluntarily withdraws a request for a trial de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “influence [a party's] choices in the hope of reducing court congestion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.