Do v. Farmer’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mahler v. Szucs · 119 Wash. 2d 210 - Bryant v. Joseph Tree, Inc. · Spokane Co. v. State Ex Rel. Co. Comrs. · Mahler v. Szucs · 54 Wash. App. 841 - In the Matter of Guardianship of Lasky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the rule threatens mandatory attorney fees for any party who requests a trial de novo but does not improve its position. Next, it offers the party an incentive to withdraw its request, with the possibility of avoiding attorney fees at the discretion of the [trial] court. Both the stick and the carrot are directed at the party requesting the trial de novo, attempting to influence its choices in the hope of reducing court congestion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hudson v. Hapner · Hudson v. Hapner“The court shall assess costs and reasonable attorney fees against a party who appeals the award and fails to improve the party’s position on the trial de novo. The court may assess costs and reasonable attorney fees against a party who voluntarily withdraws a request for a trial de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hudson v. Hapner“influence [a party's] choices in the hope of reducing court congestion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hudson v. Hapner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.