Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

110 S.C. 480

96 S.E 685

Bullock v. Jackson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 31, 1918

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1918-08-31

Before SeasE, J., Spartanburg, at chambers, 1918. Action by E. D. Bullock against Eemmon Jackson. From an order that plaintiff be allowed to gather his crops and deposit the proceeds with the clerk of Court, to be held subject to settlement of dispute, defendant appeals. submits: That injunction cannot be used to transfer possession of property from one to another: 27 S. C. 415; 78 S. C. 222; 88 S. C. 476; 84 S. C. 440; 35 F. R. A. (N. S.) 707, and note, and cases cited.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1955

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Appeal dismissed · Decided 1918-08-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gage.

¶2 The plaintiff, a tenant, sued the defendant, a landowner, to restrain the defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s entry upon land to gather the crops which the plaintiff had made' in 1917. The Circuit Judge late in January, 1918, ordered that the plaintiff be allowed to gather his crops and deposit the proceeds with the clerk of Court, there to be held subject to a settlement of the dispute of the parties. From that order comes this appeal.

¶3 1 The necessary inference is that the order has been executed, and the fund is now in the clerk’s hands.

¶4 2 If that be so it is idle to now inquire if the order was right.

¶5 The appeal is dismissed.

/110/sc/480 · .json · Public domain