Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 SO2D 464 - Hill v. State

Hill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1980
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1980

8 state decisions

401959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pope v. State · Eckles v. State · 63 So. 2d 654 - La Barbera v. State · Artigas v. State · Sinclair v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... The law inclines definitely to trial on the merits; the decision in each case must depend on the particular attending facts; and a withdrawal of a plea of guilty shall not be refused where it is in the least evident that the ends of justice will be subserved by allowing a plea of not guilty to be entered in the place of a guilty plea. Eckles v. State, 1938, 132 Fla. 526 , 180 So. 764 ."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.