Klosenski v. Flaherty’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1985
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the return of the writ is necessary to the orderly continuance of procedural steps required by the rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[f]ailure to make proof of service shall not affect the validity of the service.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.