Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 SO2D 766 - Bassemier v. WS Young Construction Co.

Bassemier v. WS Young Construction Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2004

18 state decisions

90195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brannon v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. · Reed v. Calcasieu Paper Company · Hogan v. T. J. Moss Tie Co. · Thomas v. Crown-Zellerbach Corporation · Peiser v. Grand Isle, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"An employee is considered totally disabled within the meaning of the compensation act when he is unable to perform without pain the regular and usual duties of the occupation in which the injury was sustained, that is, to perform work of the same or similar character to that in which engaged at the time of the accident. Reed v. Calcasieu Paper Co., 233 La. 747 , 98 So.2d 175 ; Brannon v. Zurich Gen. Acc. & Liab. Ins. Co., 224 La. 161 , 69 So.2d 1 ; Thomas v. Crown-Zellerbach Corp., La.App. 1 Cir., 101 So.2d 478 . The latter case also holds, with appropriate citation of authority, 101 So.2d 482 : `Where a claimant is totally disabled at the time of trial, and the evidence does not indicate the duration of disability or is conflicting as to whether the disability is permanent or temporary, compensation should be awarded for the maximum number of weeks, since the defendant employer is protected by the provision permitting revision of the judgment after six months should the disability terminate or lessen.'" (Emphasis supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.