Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 SO3D 108 - Smith v. Smith

Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lee v. Lee · 509 So. 2d 1141 - DePoorter v. DePoorter · Bassett v. Bassett · 499 So. 2d 880 - Cunningham v. Cunningham · Linstroth v. Dorgan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Viewed as a whole, the parties’ agreement unambiguously provided that all alimony was non-modifiable and would cease only upon the occurrence of the death of either of the parties, or [the former wife’s] remarriage. To be sure, the concept of a supportive relationship as a possible termination event was something the parties could have contemplated at the time they entered into their agreement. They chose not to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “2. Said alimony shall be non-modifiable by the parties, in either amount or duration, regardless of any change in circumstances of either party. 3. This alimony shall terminate on the Husband’s death, the Wife’s death, or the Wife’s remarriage, whichever shall first occur.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.