State v. Gross’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 796 So. 2d 649 - State v. Neal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Both the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, § 16 of the Louisiana Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to present a defense. State v. Decay, 07-966 (La.App. 5 Cir. 6/19/08) , 989 So.2d 132, 144 , writ denied, 08-1634 (La. 4/13/09), 5 So.3d 161 . However, the right to present a defense does not require the trial court to permit the introduction of evidence that is irrelevant or has so little probative value that it is substantially outweighed by other legitimate considerations in the administration of justice. State v. Marsalis, 04-827 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/26/05) , 902 So.2d 1081, 1088 . Relevant evidence is evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. LSA-C.E. art. 401.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.