Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 SO3D 296 - Burdette v. State

Burdette v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · Freeman v. United States · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · Bullcoming v. New Mexico

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]bvious error which was not properly raised by the defendant and which affects a defendant's fundamental, substantive right. For the plain-error doctrine to apply, there must have been an error that resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice or seriously affects the fairness, integrity[,] or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.