Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 So. 3d 732 - Mitchell v. State

110 So. 3d 732 - Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 842 So. 2d 565 - White v. State · 272 So. 2d 917 - Sumrall v. State · Hargett v. State on Writ of Certiorari · 967 So. 2d 1 - Givens v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The reason for the rule is to prevent the State from raising the inference that the accused has committed other crimes and is therefore likely to be guilty of the offense charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.