Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
44 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 42 So. 3d 503 - Rowland v. State · United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez · 872 So. 2d 711 - Williams v. State · 585 So. 2d 765 - Corley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[tjhough it is conceivable that under the facts of a particular case, a lawyer’s performance was so deficient, and so prejudicial to the defendant that the defendant’s fundamental constitutional rights were violated, our supreme court has never held that merely raising a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is sufficient to surmount the procedural bar.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The order as provided in subsection (5) of this section or any order dismissing the petitioner's motion or otherwise denying relief under this article is a final judgment and shall be conclusive until reversed. It shall be a bar to a second or successive motion under this article.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Every person convicted in this state of a felony who shall have been convicted twice previously of any felony or federal crime upon charges separately brought and arising out of separate incidents at different times and who shall have been sentenced to separate terms of one (1) year or more in any state and/or federal penal institution, whether in this state or elsewhere, shall be sentenced to the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed for such felony, and such sentence shall not be reduced or sus pended nor shall such person be eligible for parole or probation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.