Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 SW3D 57 - Sossamon v. State

Sossamon v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Garcia v. State · Oldham v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to allow appellant the opportunity to rebut the rebuttable presumption that he was effectively represented by [his attorney] during the 30-day period after [sentencing].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re KK
  2. “[e]verything in the record indicate[d] that appellant was not assisted by counsel during the 30-day critical stage for filing a motion for new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re KK

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.