Jones v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2003

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2003-02-18

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2016

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-02-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Eugene Jones, Jr. (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for postconviction relief. Appellant claims ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

¶3. All rule references are to Mo.R.Crim.P 2002, unless otherwise indicated.