Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

110 S.W.3d 870

Aliakbari v. Feicht

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 2003

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2003-07-22

Decided 2003-07-22

¶1ORDER

¶2Mohammad Aliakbari (“buyer”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing counts one through three of his amended petition against James Feicht and Lee Wisniewski (collectively “appraisers”) for breach of contract to a third party beneficiary, negligence, negligent representation, and violation of the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”).

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/110/sw3d/870 · .json · Public domain