Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 U.S. 209 - Dimpfel v. Ohio M

Dimpfel v. Ohio M’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
20
states following
January 1992
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1992 · most notably United States v. American Bell Telephone Co. (1888), Dunphy v. Traveller Newspaper Ass'n (1888)

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 20 states

1001870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hawes v. Oakland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““And it does not appear that the complainants owned their shares when these transactions took place. For aught we can see to the contrary, they may have purchased the shares long afterwards, expressly to annoy and vex the company, in the hope that they might thereby extort, from its fears, a larger benefit than the other stockholders have received or may reasonably expect from the purchase, or compel the company to buy their shares at prices above the market value. Unfortunately, litigation against large companies is often instituted by individual stockholders from no higher motive.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Objections now come with bad grace from parties who knew at the time all that was being done by the company, and gave no sign of dissatisfaction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.