Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 U.S. 217 - Aurrecoechea v. Bangs

Aurrecoechea v. Bangs’s Empirical Analysis

110 U.S. 217 · 1884

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1988

2 state decisions

2018841890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Muller v. Dows · Hambro v. Casey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In some jurisdictions, by rule of court, the case may be submitted on briefs alone, without oral argument. Stipulations between counsel for submitting causes without oral argument may be enforced, and they cannot be withdrawn by either party without the consent of the other, except by leave of the court upon cause shown. * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.