Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 U.S. 389 - Cable v. Ellis

Cable v. Ellis’s Empirical Analysis

110 U.S. 389 · 1884

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2008 · most notably Houston Ry Co v. Shirley (1884), Eaton v. Walker (1923)

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

1401884189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meyer v. Construction Co. · Sumner v. Waugh · Ellis v. Sisson · Cable v. Ellis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “can do nothing that might not have been done for him by his representative without his intervention. [The intervenor] took his place by intervention in the suit subject to all the disabilities that rested at the time on the party in whose stead he is to act.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.