Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 U.S. 471 - State of Lowa v. McFarland State of Illinois

State of Lowa v. McFarland State of Illinois’s Empirical Analysis

110 U.S. 471 · 1884

Citation profile

162
cited by 162 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

65 federal appellate · 8 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 162 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2018 · most notably Commissioner v. Brown (1965), Provost v. United States (1926)

65 federal appellate · 8 district · 27 state decisions — followed in 13 states

26018841890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Moore · The United States v. The State Bank of North Carolina · Edwards' Lessee v. Darby · United States v. George Macdaniel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 162 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`A sale, in the ordinary sense of the word, is a transfer of property for a fixed price in money or its equivalent', State of Iowa v. McFarland, 110 U.S. 471 , 478, 4 S.Ct. 210, 28 L.Ed. 198; * * *.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When each of these acts speaks of lands ‘ sold by Congress,’ , ‘five per cent of -,the net proceeds’ of which shall be reserved and be ‘disbursed’ or ‘appropriated’ for the,benefit of the States in which the land lies, it evidently has in view sales in the ordinary sense, from which the United States receive'proceeds, in the shape of money payable into the treasury, out of which the five per cent may be reserved and paid to the State; and does not intend to include lands promised and granted by the-United States as a reward for military service, for which nothing is received into the treasury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.