Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 U.S. 516 - Hurtado v. People of the State of California

Hurtado v. People of the State of California’s Empirical Analysis

110 U.S. 516 · 1884

Citation profile

2,440
cited by 2,440 later decisions
237
cited 237 times by the Supreme Court
50
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

521 federal appellate · 92 district · 995 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,440 later decisions (237 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000), Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

521 federal appellate · 92 district · 995 state decisions — followed in 50 states

3220188418901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Munn v. Illinois · John Den James Murray and John Kayser v. The Hoboken Land and Improvement Company John Den James B Murray et al. · Davidson v. New Orleans · Wall

Cited together with Albert Twining v. State of New Jersey · Maxwell v. Dow · Palko v. State of Connecticut · Gaines v. State of Washington · Cassell v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,440 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury....”
    35 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “flexibility and capacity for growth and adaptation is the peculiar boast and excellence of the common law.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “' "intended to secure the individual from the arbitrary exercise of the powers of government,”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.