Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Utah 355 - State v. Kilpatrick

State v. Kilpatrick’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2000

3 state decisions

101946195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Karas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for identification by voice of a person to be sufficient [to sustain a conviction], the identifier must either be familiar with the voice of the person identified or that person's voice possesses some peculiar characteristic which could not be easily mistaken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.