Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Wash. 2d 253 - State v. Collins

110 Wash. 2d 253 - State v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
5
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably In Re Detention of Stout (2007), 112 Wash. 2d 399 - State v. Collicott (1989)

2 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

26019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on General Reinsurance Corp. v. Commissioner · 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 88 Wash. 2d 221 - State v. Wanrow · People v. Barry · 102 Wash. 2d 380 - Wendle v. Farrow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person `enters or remains unlawfully' in or upon premises when he is not then licensed, invited, or otherwise privileged to so enter or remain.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... The record supports an inference that the invitation or license extended to Collins was limited to a specific area and a single purpose. Collins was a total stranger. Charlotte made an offer only of the use of her telephone. She led him to one particular telephone and handed it to him herself. No reasonable person could construe this as a general invitation to all areas of the house for any purpose. A second theory, likewise to be applied on a case by case basis, supports the same result. Once Collins grabbed the two women and they resisted being dragged into the bedroom, any privilege Collins had up to that time was revoked.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A person is guilty of burglary in the first degree if, with intent to commit a crime against a person or property therein, he enters or remains unlawfully in a dwelling and if, in entering or while in the dwelling or in immediate flight therefrom, the actor . . . assaults any person therein.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.