Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Wash. 2d 728 - State v. Barefield

110 Wash. 2d 728 - State v. Barefield’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
14
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently January 2008 · most notably Moody v. Corsentino (1993), Stone v. State (1996)

3 federal appellate · 57 state decisions — followed in 14 states

290198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cuyler v. Adams · Carchman v. Nash New Jersey Department of Corrections · Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Richman Bros. · Joseph F. Tinghitella v. State of California · 95 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Coyle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]ne of the main purposes of the IAD is to deter the filing of meritless detainers. If a detainer is lodged against a prisoner, that may well affect the quality of his treatment in the receiving state. He may be denied parole or work release, for example. The IAD's speedy trial provision is designed to avoid this situation by permitting the prisoner to exonerate himself, if he can, of the charge in the receiving state.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he IAD provides that the prisoner must be tried within 180 days of his giving notice to those who have him in custody.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “prisoner is required to inform the officials having custody of him of his desire for speedy disposition”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.