State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 111 Wash. 2d 353 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Williams · 123 Wash. 2d 391 - Caritas Services, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health Services · State v. Hennings · State v. Everybodytalksabout · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in any right to be scored under the old rules, even if we were to accept his vesting argument. Mr. Perry cites to no authority supporting his claim that the Legislature cannot change the scoring rules with respect to existing prior convictions. Nothing in Smith or Cruz suggests that the court intended to repudiate the long line of Washington cases holding that defendants have no vested right in the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Perry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.