Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 110 Wis. 2d 414 - State v. Padilla

110 Wis. 2d 414 - State v. Padilla’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

117
cited by 117 later decisions
20
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 107 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 117 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably State v. Smith (1985), 155 Wis. 2d 633 - State v. Pulizzano (1990)

4 federal appellate · 107 state decisions — followed in 20 states

5801982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · United States v. Nick · 94 Wis. 2d 450 - Muller v. State · 77 Wis. 2d 50 - Christensen v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co. · 86 Wis. 2d 272 - Milenkovic v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'An offer of proof need not be syllogistically perfect but it ought to enable a reviewing court to act with reasonable confidence that the evidentiary hypothesis can be sustained and is not merely an enthusiastic advocate's overstated assumption.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant *Page 1370 was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “for a longer period after the incident than with adults.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.