110 Wis. 2d 693 - State v. Stubbendick’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

22 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “based upon objective information concerning identifiable conduct on the part of the defendant occurring after the time of the original sentencing proceeding.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Johnson · 208 Wis. 2d 142 - State v. Carter

2. “He obviously, with his demonstrated modus operandi, deliberately chose to attack her in the privacy of her living quarters. She will now no longer feel completely secure in her own home. The law respects the sanctity of a person's dwelling. No longer will this victim be able to relax and feel secure in the one area where all citizens should be able to feel safe, that is, in her home. She has been attacked in that `safe' area and will always have doubts concerning her security.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 110 Wis. 2d 661 - State v. Billings

3. “a statement in the record regarding this consideration negates the possibility of judicial vindictiveness, which is the paramount concern of Pearce and Denny.” Id. 3 Judge Vuvunas also stated that had he imposed sentence”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 147 Wis. 2d 95 - State v. Tarwid