¶1We are of the opinion that the plaintiff had a right to put out and maintain signs upon the *918leased premises, and, therefore, there was a question for determination by the trial court. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and, Miller, JJ., concurred,
111 A.D. 917
Sessler v. Martin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 1906
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1906-01-15
Decided 1906-01-15