State v. Seebold’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
46
cited by 46 later decisions
6
states following
July 1986
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Valdez · State v. Brierly · State v. Trotter · State v. Bowen · State v. Keener
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Thus, in the crime of ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON, a necessary fact to be proved is the existence in the mind of the Defendant of the specific intent to do harm, . . . ” (Emphasis added.) Ill Ariz. at 426, 531 P.2d at 1133 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bustamonte
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.