State v. Domme’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
April 1985
most recently cited
32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Harrington v. California · State v. Rice · State v. King · State v. Pierce · State v. Masters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In deciding whether a prior conviction can be utilized for impeachment purposes, the trial court takes into account many factors such as the remoteness of the conviction, the nature of the prior felony, the length of the former imprisonment, the age of the defendant, and his conduct since the prior offense. State v. King, supra. There are no set guidelines. Because of the many factors to be taken into consideration, the admissibility of prior convictions is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge whose decision will not be overturned in the absence of an abuse of discretion.” State v. Domme, 111 Ariz. 464, 465-66 , 532 P.2d 526, 527-28 (1975).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Noble
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.