Hellman v. Marquardt’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1989
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Nicholl v. Koster · 19 Cal. 2d 111 - Wilson v. Walters · 37 Cal. 2d 718 - Villanazul v. City of Los Angeles · Ballantyne v. Bower · Graham v. Mayor & Bd. of Trs. of Fresno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where action brought. An action brought in the Superior Court under this Rule shall be brought in the county in which the body or officer has or should have determined the matter to be re viewed, or, in the case of a state officer or body, either in Maricopa County or in the county of residence of the plaintiff. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Collins v. Corbin““An action brought in the Superior Court under this Rule shall be brought . in the case of a state officer or body, either in Maricopa County or in the county of residence of the plaintiff”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bishop v. Marks““The Rules of Procedure for Special Actions do not provide for the transfer of a special action to another county for determination.” Ill Ariz. at 98.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.