Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 ARK 305 - Brinkley v. Taylor

Brinkley v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
October 1978
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 1978

22 state decisions

601914192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Livingston v. Cochran · Stidham v. Matthews · Barnett v. Meacham · Webb v. Smith · Danley v. Danley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘‘It is settled that if a widow conveys her dower interest before it is assigned to her, the heir may recover the land from her vendee, and the statute of limitations is set in motion against the heir when her vendee enters into the possession.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.