111 Cal. App. 55 - People v. Cheaney’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 1957
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on People v. Newell · 51 Cal. App. 370 - People v. Stennett · People v. Nagy · 67 Cal. App. 128 - People v. Farrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . . While the information was filed about three years and sixty-two days after the commission of the crime, it was pleaded and stipulated that the defendant was absent from and outside the boundaries of the state from July 8, 1928, to October 11, 1928, or a period more than three months. The claim that the statute of limitations had run against the charge is without foundation. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.