111 Cal. App. 4th 1310 - People v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 2008
most recently cited
28 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Faretta v. California · Jones v. United States · 13 Cal. 4th 497 - People v. Superior Court (Romero) · United States v. Tighe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen a juvenile receives all the process constitutionally due at the juvenile stage, there is no constitutional problem (on which Apprendi focused) in using that adjudication to support a later sentencing enhancement.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“unlike virtually any other consideration used to enlarge the possible penalty for an offense, and certainly unlike the factor before us in this case, a prior conviction must itself have been established through procedures satisfying the fair notice, reasonable doubt and jury trial guarantees.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Jones does not support [the] broad conclusion ... that the jury trial right is an indispensable part of 'a fundamental triumvirate of procedural protections intended to guarantee the reliability of criminal convictions'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.