Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Conn. 482 - Chubb v. Holmes

Chubb v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
4
states following
March 1997
most recently cited

2 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 1997 · most notably Ardoline v. Keegan (1954), Shelnitz v. Greenberg (1986)

2 district · 36 state decisions

1401930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Slimak v. Foster · Styles v. Tyler · Sweeney v. Erving · Leighton v. Sargent · Slade v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The only exception to this rule is afforded by cases `where there is manifest such obvious gross want of care or skill as to afford, of itself, an almost conclusive inference of [lack of skill or care] and dispense with the necessity of testimony by expert witnesses.' Slimak v. Foster, [ 106 Conn. 366 , 370 ].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[O]rdinarily, where the exercise of proper professional skill or care on the part of a physician, surgeon, dentist, or other similar practitioner is in issue, expert testimony tending to establish want of such skill or care is essential to a recovery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The reason, briefly stated, is that in most such cases a layman does not and cannot have the requisite knowledge as to whether the proper treatment was given, procedure followed, or care used.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.