Ragali v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Smith v. Smith (1962), Felletter v. Thompson (1946)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Reilly v. Antonio Pepe Co. · Norton v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co. · Murphy v. Elms Hotel · Bronson v. President of Mechanics Bank · Galvin v. Birch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No such procedure is known to our practice. The motion to dismiss must be decided upon the question or questions of law arising on the facts upon the record and hence there is no occasion for any procedure following it save a hearing there on."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“admits all well pleaded facts and invokes the existing record and must be decided upon that alone.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.