Parker v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
111 F. 470 · 1901
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1926
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Francois Fenelon v. The Mayor Aldermen and Citizens of Philadelphia · Connecticut Mut Life Ins Co v. Union Trust Co of New York · Thompson v. Railroad Companies · Vance v. Campbell · Potter v. National Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In that case, dealing with a contract for future delivery, the court held that when an agent contracts, in good'faith in his own name, with other parties for the sale of property for future delivery, and there is a bona fide intention on the part of the agent and other contracting parties at the time of making the contract to actually deliver on the one hand and actually receive on the other, at the period mentioned in the contract, such agent cannot recover from his principal losses or advances made on such contracts, unless he can show thq.t it was the bona fide intention of his principal at the time of making the contract to actually deliver or to receive the property sold, at the maturity of the contract.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lawton v. Carpenter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.