Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 F.2d 548 - Drybrough v. Ware

Drybrough v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis

111 F.2d 548 · 1940

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2007 · most notably United States v. Rodriguez-Morales (1991), George McClanahan and William Clinger v. William B. Mathews (1971)

19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1001940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Union Trust Co of New York v. Illinois Midland Ry Co Borg · Frank Jones v. Charles Springer · Fisher v. Cushman · Hill v. Chicago & Evanston Railroad · Cunningham v. German Ins. Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This power [to dismiss], however, should not be exercised generally unless the omission arose from negligence or indifference of appellant and, where good faith is shown, ... the court, in order to avoid injustice, may, on a proper suggestion or on its motion, direct that the omission be corrected by a supplemental transcript or remand the cause for a finding on controverted fact questions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “should not be exercised generally unless the omission arose from negligence or indifference of appellant and, where good faith is shown, ... the court, in order to avoid injustice, may, on a proper suggestion or on its own motion, direct that the omission be corrected by a supplemental transcript....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““[I]t becomes the duty of the court, after the money is paid in and before distribution, to determine the rank of all claims thereto and supervise the distribution and payment accordingly.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.