Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 F.2d 611 - Conway v. O'Brien

Conway v. O'Brien’s Empirical Analysis

111 F.2d 611 · 1940

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2007 · most notably Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad (1952), 56 Ill. 2d 372 - Cunis v. Brennan (1974)

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 25 state decisions — followed in 12 states

1301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman · Shaw, Admr. v. Moore · Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. Mouber · Hall v. Royce · Dessereau v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “demanded of a person by an occasion is the resultant of three factors: the likelihood that his conduct will injure others, taken with the seriousness of the injury if it happens, and balanced against the interest which he must sacrifice, or the cost of the precaution he must take, to avoid the risk.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is plain * * * that we cannot properly devolve the entire responsibility for a decision upon a jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.