Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 F.2d 789 - Walkup v. Bardsley

Walkup v. Bardsley’s Empirical Analysis

111 F.2d 789 · 1940

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
5
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2006

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

601940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gunning v. Cooley · Lumbra v. United States · Southern Pac Co v. Pool · Elzig v. Gudwangen · People's Savings Bank v. Bates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) The driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection shall yield the right-of-way to a vehicle which has entered the intersection from a different highway.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.