Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 F.3d 1148 - Gutierrez de Martinez v. Drug Enforcement Administration

Gutierrez de Martinez v. Drug Enforcement Administration’s Empirical Analysis

111 F.3d 1148 · 1997

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 11 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC (2003), Borneman v. United States (2000)

11 federal appellate · 11 district · 2 state decisions

2301997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mitchell v. Forsyth · Williams v. United States · Gutierrez De Martinez v. Lamagno · Westfall v. Erwin · McElrath v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [The act] was expressly or impliedly directed by the employer, or is naturally incident to the business, and (2) it was performed, although mistakenly or ill-advisedly, with the intent to further the employer’s interest, or from some impulse or emotion that was the natural consequence of an attempt to do the employer’s business, “and did not arise wholly from some external, independent and personal motive on the part of the [employee] to do the act upon his own account.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Upon certification by the Attorney General that the defendant employee was acting within the scope of his office or employment at the time of the incident out of which the claim arose, any civil action or proceeding commenced upon such claim in a United States district court shall be deemed an action against the United States under the provisions of this title and all references thereto, and the United States shall be substituted as the party defendant.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “weigh the evidence on each side to determine whether the certification should stand.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.