Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 F.3d 1332 - Palmquist v. Selvik

Palmquist v. Selvik’s Empirical Analysis

111 F.3d 1332 · 1997

Citation profile

111
cited by 111 later decisions
4
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Pineda v. City of Houston (2002), Reynolds v. Giuliani (2007)

61 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

7701997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Graham v. Connor · City of Canton v. Harris · Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati · Spencer Gifts, Inc. v. Olitsky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'inconsistent with substantial justice.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “injury or accident could have been avoided if an officer had had better or more training, sufficient to equip him to avoid the particular injury causing conduct.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “appellant carries a heavy burden in challenging a trial court's evidentiary rulings”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.