Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 F.3d 52 - Cacok v. Covington

Cacok v. Covington’s Empirical Analysis

111 F.3d 52 · 1997

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Dexia Crédit Local v. Rogan (2010), 361 Ill. App. 3d 352 - Tm Ryan Co. v. 5350 South Shore, L.L.C. (2005)

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

130199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. Ionization International, Inc. · 265 Ill. App. 3d 711 - Bloink v. Olson · 100 Ill. App. 3d 360 - Kirchheimer Brothers Co. v. Jewelry Mine, Ltd. · 249 Ill. App. 3d 127 - Home State Bank/National Ass'n v. Potokar · 168 Ill. 2d 130 - Podvinec v. Popov

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A proceeding under this rule continues until terminated by motion of the judgment creditor, order of the court, or satisfaction of the judgment, but terminates automatically 6 months from the date of (1) the respondent’s first personal appearance pursuant to the citation or (2) the respondent’s first personal appearance pursuant to subsequent process issued to enforce the citation, whichever is sooner. The court may, however, grant extensions beyond the 6 months, as justice may require. Orders for the payment of money continue in effect notwithstanding the termination of the proceedings until the judgment is satisfied or the court orders otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.