United States v. Simmonds’s Empirical Analysis
111 F.3d 737 · 1997
Citation profile
136 federal appellate · 25 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 331 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably McIntosh v. United States Parole Commission (1997), Miller v. Marr (1998)
136 federal appellate · 25 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1791 · 28 U.S.C. § 1914 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · United States v. Frady · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Griffith v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 331 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“prisoners whose convictions became final on or before April 24, 1996 must file their § 2255 motions before April 24, 1997.”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] 1-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section,”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.