Fluor Constructors, Inc. v. Reich’s Empirical Analysis
111 F.3d 94 · 1997
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2014
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · English v. General Electric Co. · Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co. · Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney · Sullivan v. Finkelstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“situations 'where a party has performed an act which, if properly done, would postpone the deadline for filing his appeal and has received specific assurance by a judicial officer that this act has been properly done.' Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney, 489 U.S. 169 , 179, 109 S. Ct. 987, 993, 103 L.Ed.2d 146 (1989).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.