Luna-Ramirez v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang · Moosa v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Hernandez v. Ashcroft · Mireles-Valdez v. Ashcroft · Hernandez-Rodriguez v. Pasquarell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Moosa v. INS, 171 F.3d 994 , 1013 (5th Cir.1999) (quoting INS v. Jong Ha Wang, 450 U.S. 139 , 144, 101 S.Ct. 1027, 67 L.Ed.2d 123 (1981)). Here, we find that the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilmore v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.