Bond v. Hewitt’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Dudley v. Harrison, McCready & Co. (1937), Crossman v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. (1959)
3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Florida Moss Products Co. v. City of Leesburg · Capital City Bank v. Hilson · Chamberlain v. Lesley · Herrin v. Abbe · People's National Bank v. Magruder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here a written instrument does not purport to contain the entire agreement between the parties thereto, nor to have been intended as a complete statement or whole contract, and where such instrument was executed pursuant to a parol agreement and in part performance thereof, parol evidence is admissible when consistent with, and not contrary to, such written instrument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ten dollars and other valuable considerations,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bostwick v. Antuono
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.