Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 111 Fla. 320 - Ingram v. Prescott

Ingram v. Prescott’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
6
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 2004 · most notably Henderson v. State (1938), Cortes v. State (1938)

38 state decisions

12019331940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whiskey Cases v. Ford · Alvord v. United States · Wight v. Rindshopf · Linsday v. . People of the State of N.Y. · State v. Graham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “From the earliest times, it has been found necessary for the detection and punishment of crime, for the state to resort to the criminals themselves for testimony with which to convict their confederates in crime .... Therefore, on the ground of public policy, it has been uniformly held that a state may contract with a criminal for his exemption from prosecution if he shall honestly and fairly make a full disclosure of the crime, whether the party testified against is convicted or not.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “But it is generally held that such an agreement is not pleadable in bar of an adjudication of guilt, although it may affect the right of the court to enforce or to impose a sentence for the infliction of punishment. Cameron v. State, supra, (Texas); Newton v. State, 15 Fla. 610 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.